ANALISIS KOMPARATIF LAPORAN KEBERLANJUTAN PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN PADA KATEGORI EKONOMI (SERI 200) SESUAI STANDAR GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36277/geoekonomi.v15i1.2024.465Keywords:
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Kategori Ekonomi, Laporan KeberlanjutanAbstract
This research aims to analyze and compare sustainability reports disclosed by mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the oil and gas production and refinery sub-sector. By using GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standard guidelines, This research uses the economic category (series 200) as a specific topic focus. The type of research is descriptive-qualitative, with content analysis techniques and comparative methods. The research results show that from the specific topics raised by six companies based on the subsector, six companies were listed. There are 2 companies that, upon accessing the company website, do not report sustainability reports, namely PT. Sugih Energy Tbk SUGI and PT. Super Energy Tbk-SURE. Sustainability Reports were prepared by 4 companies referring to POJK Standards, namely PT. Astrindo Nusantara Infrastruktur Tbk-BIPI, PT. Energi Mega Persada Tbk-ENRG, PT. Medco Energi Internasional Tbk-MEDC, and PT. Mitra Investindo Tbk-MITI. And PT refers to the GRI Standards. Energi Mega Persada Tbk-ENRG and PT. Mitra Investindo Tbk
MITI and PT. Medco Energi Internasional Tbk-MEDC. Level of disclosure of specific topics at PT. Mitra Investindo Tbk-MITI by 29% and PT. Energi Mega Persada Tbk-ENRG by 50% and PT. Medco Energi Internasional Tbk-MEDC by 57%. This indicates that there are still many companies that do not refer to the GRI Standards because of their voluntary nature in making sustainability reports. Not all disclosures based on the GRI Standards have been disclosed, so the percentage results are still not high enough. Based on the results of this research, it is hoped that companies can make better and more complete sustainability reports that refer to the GRI Standards in the coming year
Downloads
References
Al Hamzah, M. H., Kurniawan, W. O., Rizqiani, A., & Indra, D. (2023). Analisis Komparatif
Laporan Keberlanjutan Kategori Sosial Standar Gri Pada Perusahaan Telekomunikasi.
Majalah Ekonomi, 28(01), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.36456/majeko.vol28.no01.a7098
Alhaddi, H. (2015). Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review. Business and
Management Studies, 1(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v1i2.752
Babiak, K. (2010). CSR and Environmental Responsibility: Motives and Pressures to Adopt
Green Management Practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 24(March 2010), 11–24.
Carroll, A. B. (2009). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices.
In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Issue July 2016).
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002
Chatterjee, B., & Mitra, N. (2017). CSR should contribute to the national agenda in emerging
economies - the ‘Chatterjee Model.’ International Journal of Corporate Social
Responsibility, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0012-1
Chen, C. J., Guo, R. S., Hsiao, Y. C., & Chen, K. L. (2018). How business strategy in nonfinancial firms moderates the curvilinear effects of corporate social responsibility and
irresponsibility on corporate financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 92,
–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.030
Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S. and Spence, L. (2019). Business ethics: Managing corporate
citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization . Oxford University Press, USA.
books.google.com.
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fcSbDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&d
q=physical+activity+and+aging&ots=MsidcypZPv&sig=QhJQGBwfoqdrn2ra27GpfvkZ
Igg
Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting
initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 106–117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.11.008
Kadłubek, M. (2015). The Essence of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Performance of
Selected Company. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 509–515.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.442
Księżak, P., & Fischbach, B. (2018). Triple Bottom Line: The Pillars of CSR. Journal of
Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 4(3), 95.
https://doi.org/10.12775/jcrl.2017.018
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a
comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management
Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
Mitra, N., Akhtar, A., & Gupta, A. Das. (2018). Communicating Corporate Social
Responsibility in the post mandate period: Evidence from India. International Journal of
Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0033-4
Nguyen, M., Bensemann, J., & Kelly, S. (2018). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in
Vietnam: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Corporate Social
Responsibility, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0032-5
Nikolaou, I. E., & Evangelinos, K. I. (2010). Classifying current social responsibility
accounting methods for assisting a dialogue between business and society. Social
Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011083446
Peršić, M., Janković, S., & Krivačić, D. (2017). Sustainability Accounting: Upgrading
Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance, March
, 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39089-5_15
Saldaña, J. (2011). A survey of qualitative data analytic methods. In Fundamentals of
Qualitative Research: Understanding Qualitative Research.
Sethi, B. (2014). CSR-an essential strategic reputation management tool. CSR &
Competitiveness, 1(9), 20.
Smith, D., & Rhiney, E. (2020). CSR commitments, perceptions of hypocrisy, and recovery.
International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-019-0046-7
Sotorrío, L. L., & Sánchez, J. L. F. (2010). Corporate social reporting for different audiences:
The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 17(5), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.215
Streimikiene, D., Simanaviciene, Z., & Kovaliov, R. (2009). Corporate social responsibility for
implementation of sustainable energy development in Baltic States. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(4), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.007
Tsalis, T. A., Malamateniou, K. E., Koulouriotis, D., & Nikolaou, I. E. (2020). New challenges
for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable
development and the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 27(4), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1910
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal GeoEkonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the materials in any medium or format for any purpose, even for commercial purposes.
Adapt - compose, change and develop the material for any purpose, even for commercial purposes.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
With the following conditions:
Attribution - you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in a reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions - You may not implement legal provisions or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything permitted by the license.
Notice:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material that are in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exclusion or restriction.
No warranties are given. This license may not grant all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
_geoekonomi.png)
_geoekonomi.png)
