PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN KONFLIK KERJA STRES KERJA DAN ROTASI KARYAWAN TERHADAP KINERJA BERDASARKAN PERSEPSI KARYAWAN DI RUMAH SAKIT PERTAMINA BALIKPAPAN

Authors

  • Hermin Nainggolan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Balikpapan
  • Gita Kemala Sari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Balikpapan
  • Erwin Susilo Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Balikpapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36277/geoekonomi.v16i1.549

Keywords:

Performance, Leadership Style, Work Conflict, Work Stress, Employee Rotation

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of leadership style, work conflict, work stress and employee rotation on performance based on employee perceptions of PT. Pertamina Balikpapan Hospital. The sample used in this study in the Medical Check UP, radiology, laboratory and medical record installations amounted to 54 respondents. The analysis technique used was multiple linear regression analysis, classical assumption test. The statistical analysis test tool used was the SPSS version 24 program. Based on the study, the results obtained that partially, the Leadership Style variable has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance. This is indicated by the t-count value of 2.868>t-table 2.00958 and a significance value of 0.006 which is less than 0.05. The Work Conflict variable does not have a positive and insignificant effect on Employee Performance. This is indicated by the t-count value of 0.422 <t-table 2.00958 and a significance value of 0.675 which is greater than 0.05. The Work Stress variable has a negative and insignificant effect on Performance. This is indicated by the obtained t-value of -0.615 <ttable 2.00958 and a significance value of 0.541 which is greater than 0.05. The Employee Rotation variable has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance. This is indicated by the obtained t-value of 3.826> ttable 2.00958 and a significance value of 0.000 which is less than 0.05. That simultaneously the results obtained by Leadership Style, Work Conflict, Work Stress and Employee Rotation have a significant effect on Employee Performance. This is indicated by the obtained F-value of 14.689> F-table 2.56 with a significance value of 0.000 which is less than 0.05.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, R., & Beddu, M. (2022). Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Rumah Sakit Fatima Kota Parepare. YUME : Journal of Management, 5(3), 267–271.

Burta, F. S. (2018). Supervisi, Insentif dan Rotasi Kerja Pada Rumah Sakit Aura Syifa Kediri. 1, 430–439.

Fahmi, I. (2016). Pengantar Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Mitra Wacana Media.

Hamali, A. Y. (2018). Pemahaman Sumber Daya Manusia. Buku Seru.

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2017). Manajemen SDM. Bumi Aksara.

Husein, U. (2015). Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Organisasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ilham, L. (2018). Pengaruh Stres Kerja dan Kepuasan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Rumah Sakit Azzahra-Ujungbatu. Fisip, 5(1), 1–10.

Khadijah, S. (2021). Pengaruh Konflik dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Rumah Sakit Bhakti Dharma Husada Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 5(11), 1558–1572.

Khotimah, E. (2021). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi aan Pelatihan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Rumah Sakit Pondok Indah Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi, 23(1), 31.

Mardijanto, S., & Sntoni, I. (2020). Pengaruh Rotasi Kerja Dengan Kinerja Karyawan di Rumah Sakit Bina Sehat Jember. 8(2), 102–114.

Prabowo, O. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Motivasi Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. 1(2), 113–130.

Siti Komara. (2020). Pengaruh Konflik Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Rumah Sakit Sumber Kasih Kota Cirebon. Satukan Tekad Menuju Indonesia Sehat, 2(2), 104–114.

Sudarmanto, E. (2021). Manajemen Konflik. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Nainggolan, H., Kemala Sari, G., & Susilo, E. (2025). PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN KONFLIK KERJA STRES KERJA DAN ROTASI KARYAWAN TERHADAP KINERJA BERDASARKAN PERSEPSI KARYAWAN DI RUMAH SAKIT PERTAMINA BALIKPAPAN. Jurnal GeoEkonomi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.36277/geoekonomi.v16i1.549

Issue

Section

Articles