PENGARUH KOMISARIS WANITA TERHADAP HUBUNGAN ANTARA EKSEKUTIF WANITA DAN KEPUTUSAN PENDANAAN PERUSAHAAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36277/geoekonomi.v15i2.506Keywords:
Female Executive, Funding Decisions, Women's Commissioner, Long-term debt, Short Term DebtAbstract
This research will test the influence of female executives on funding decisions with female commissioners as a moderating variable, using research objects of companies in Indonesia and listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. This research will further explore research conducted by Datta et al. (2021), where they use data from companies in America which have a different culture from Indonesia. This research uses a female board of commissioners as a moderating variable, due to differences in company management structures. This research uses the Ordinary Least Squares method with a sample of 364 non-financial companies during the 2017–2021 period. The test results show that female executives have no effect on the proportion of debt, both short-term and long-term. Female commissioners weaken the relationship between female executives and the proportion of short-term debt, but strengthen the relationship between female executives and the proportion of long-term debt. For company management, the results of this research can be used as a guide for decision-making regarding funding and the selection of top management. This research could be a reference for future researchers and trigger further research on this topic.
Downloads
References
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.00
Alesina, A., Lotti, F., & Mistrulli, P. (2013). Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01100.x
Asri, M. (2013). Keuangan Keperilakuan (1st ed.). BPFE.
Datta, S., Doan, T., & Toscano, F. (2021). Top executive gender, board gender diversity, and financing decisions: Evidence from debt structure choice. Journal of Banking & Finance. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106070
Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 193–209. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008
Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8096
Gull, A. A., Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., & Chtioui, T. (2018). Beyond gender diversity: How specific attributes of female directors affect earnings management. British Accounting Review, 50(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.001
Hackbarth, D. (2009). Determinants of corporate borrowing: A behavioral perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.02.001
Li, Y., & Zhang, X. Y. (2019). Impact of board gender composition on corporate debt maturity structures. Eur. Financ. Manage, 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12214
Lucas-Perez, M. E., Minguez-Vera, A., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., Martin-Ugedo, J. F., & S’anchez Marin, G. (2015). Women on the board and managers’ pay: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2148-1
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x
Maxfield, S., Shapiro, M., Gupta, V., & Hass, S. (2010). Gender and risk: Women, risk taking and risk aversion. Gender in Management, 25(7), 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011081383
Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
Putri, Galuh & Marwan Asri. (2023). Pengaruh Eksekutif Wanita Terhadap Keputusan Pendanaan (Dengan Komisaris Wanita Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi). Thesis Gelar Master, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Rocca, M., Neha, N., & Rocca, T. (2020). Female management, overconfidence and debt maturity: European evidence. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(3), 713–747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09479-9
Schopohl, L., Urquhart, A., & Zhang, H. (2021). Female CFOs, leverage and the moderating role of board diversity and CEO power. Journal of Corporate Finance. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101858
Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/116920
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Sudarsi, Bambang Sudiyatno, Cahyani Nuswandari, Galuh Kusuma Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the materials in any medium or format for any purpose, even for commercial purposes.
Adapt - compose, change and develop the material for any purpose, even for commercial purposes.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
With the following conditions:
Attribution - you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in a reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions - You may not implement legal provisions or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything permitted by the license.
Notice:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material that are in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exclusion or restriction.
No warranties are given. This license may not grant all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.